|
by Shannon Minter
Editor’s note: This issue of IN Los Angeles magazine
went to press just days before Shannon Minter was scheduled
to make the case for same-sex marriage before the California
Supreme Court.
In 1948, the California Supreme Court became
the first court in the nation to strike down laws restricting
the right to marry based on race. In that historic decision,
the court held that laws infringing the fundamental freedom
to marry “must
be based upon more than prejudice and must be free from oppressive
discrimination to comply with the constitutional requirements
of due process and equal protection of the laws.”
Sixty years later, the California Supreme Court is poised
to decide whether laws that bar same-sex couples from marriage
also violate the California Constitution.
On Tuesday morning, March 4, the court will hear arguments
from attorneys on each side of the case. They will then have
up to 90 days to issue a decision either striking the marriage
ban or permitting it to stand.
The significance of this decision for our community is hard
to overstate. Throughout history, LGBT people have forged
enduring relationships and made significant contributions
to society despite facing relentless and often violent discrimination.
In California alone, in the not-so-distant past, LGBT people
were criminalized and labeled mentally ill, denied the right
to work as teachers or public officials, subjected to forced
psychiatric treatments, prevented from forming political
associations and arrested in bars—and even private
clubs—merely for socializing together. Thanks to the
sacrifices and leadership of countless LGBT individuals and
allies, we have stood up to these injustices and demanded
change.
If the California Supreme Court decides that same-sex couples
must be permitted to marry, that ruling will bring an end
to one of the last vestiges of government-sponsored discrimination
against LGBT people. In virtually every other area, the State
of California has barred discrimination based on sexual orientation—including
in employment, housing, education, credit, insurance, public
accommodations and parenting.
Since 2000, the state has permitted same-sex couples to enter
into domestic partnerships, which now provide significant
legal rights and protections. And twice in the past three
years, the California Legislature has voted to permit same-sex
couples to marry, only to have those measures vetoed by the
governor. Removal of the marriage ban would be the logical,
and long awaited, culmination of our historical transformation
from pariahs to equal citizens.
Of course we will still face problems and challenges, but
we will finally be able to do so from a position of legal
equality, without being officially labeled and stigmatized
as inferior by the law.
The impact of that transformation would be profound. The
current law bars same-sex couples from one of our society’s
most important and cherished institutions. The corrosive
force of that official message of discrimination affects
virtually every aspect of our lives—from relationships
with our families of origin to daily interactions with co-workers,
employers, public officials and even straight friends. Whether
it be a coroner who will not accept a surviving same-sex
partner as next of kin, or a parent who cannot view a child’s
same-sex partner as a family member, the marriage ban reinforces
the societal view that same-sex relationships are not as
significant, enduring or real as heterosexual relationships.
For LGBT youth, this message is particularly damaging. No
young person should grow up knowing that he or she is barred
by law from a right as fundamental to human freedom and dignity
as whether and whom to marry.
When the California Supreme Court struck down California’s
ban on interracial marriages in 1948, it took a courageous
stand for freedom and justice. Six decades later, we are
facing another historic crossroads that will affect the dreams,
aspirations and well being of LGBT people for generations
to come.
On March 4, we will ask the Court to honor the noble legacy
of its 1948 decision and to hold that lesbian, gay, bisexual
and transgender people have the same fundamental human rights
as others, including the freedom to marry the person of their
choice.
Shannon Minter, the legal director for the National Center
for Lesbian Rights, is one of the lead attorneys representing
same-sex couples before the California Supreme Court. A much-honored
transgender activist, Minter is also featured with his wife,
Robin, on a special video at www.letcaliforniaring.org.
Something
in the news got you fired up? Write, or suggest, an opinion
piece by e-mailing us at letters@inlamag.com
|