|
by Karen Ocamb
The news is not good.
“The economic situation has become distinctly less
favorable” since last summer, Federal Reserve Chairman
Ben Bernanke told a congressional committee Feb. 27.
The economic erosion is also hitting California, with the
state Legislature's independent chief fiscal analyst, Elizabeth
Hill, reporting Feb. 20 that the state’s budget shortfall
is $16 billion, not the $14.5 billion Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger
announced when he released his budget proposal with 10 percent
spending cuts, across-the-board.
Calling Schwarzenegger’s proposal “short-sighted”—including
$471 million in welfare cuts that would hurt needy children—Hill
presented an alternative budget proposal that noted how tax
breaks and loopholes could be modified or eliminated, and
she called for a tax hike of at least $2.7 billion.
Schwarzenegger supports closing loopholes but rejected raising
taxes. “While I believe that we should begin negotiations
with all ideas on the table,” the governor said in
a statement, “I have been very clear in my position
against raising taxes to fix Sacramento’s spending
problem and our budget.”
According to Hill, the roughly $2 billion saved through a
recent package of bills with emergency spending cuts in school
programs and healthcare for the poor were cancelled out by
the hard-hit housing market and high energy costs, the Los
Angeles Times reported.
Included in that package was a 10 percent cut in Medi-Cal
provider rates, effective July 1, which raised concern in
the HIV/AIDS community.
“Medi-Cal reimbursement rates are already so low that
half the doctors across California turn away the 6.4 million
children, seniors and people with disabilities on Medi-Cal,” said
Craig E. Thompson, executive director of AIDS Project Los
Angeles. “These cuts will just make it much harder
for people with AIDS and other diseases to access care and
treatment.”
In an exclusive interview with IN Los Angeles magazine on
Feb. 22, Lt. Gov. John Garamendi also expressed concern about
the healthcare cuts.
“I understand the proposal would continue anti-viral
medications but cut off drugs that deal with infections and
illnesses that result from HIV. That means there are going
to be a certain number of people who are going to die as
a result of not getting those drugs.”
Garamendi also noted cuts in the program designed to track
infection rates, which he believes will lead to a “more
rapid spread of HIV and the result of AIDS … [Is]
this the appropriate place for a 10 percent cut?”
Garamendi called the 10 percent, across-the-board cuts “a
very simplistic and unwise way of allocating scarce resources.
So what, hopefully, the Legislature will do is to look at
those programs that are critical to public health, safety
and education, and prioritize those,” though programs
affecting AIDS “seem to me extremely important.”
Eric Bauman, the openly gay former special assistant to Gov.
Gray Davis, who now serves as Garamendi’s special assistant,
called the Schwarzenegger cuts a “paradigm shift,” noting
that Davis believed it was more beneficial and cheaper to
keep people healthy through early prevention and primary
care than to pay for intensive care.
Garamendi is also very worried about the impact the budget
cuts will have on education.
“Education is the most important infrastructure item
in the state,” Garamendi said. “Without the intellectual
infrastructure, the state will not prosper either economically
or socially.”
The budget proposal “sets California back and quite
possibly onto an irreversible course of decline,” Garamendi
said. He noted that the proposal removes 107,000 teachers
from the classroom and increases classroom size by 20-25
percent, as well as “slams the door of higher education” on
10,000 students at the CSU system and somewhere between 2,000-5,000
students at the UC.
Such cuts would also have a “devastating effect” on
students at the beginning of the “education pipeline” in
elementary school. “Their opportunity for quality education
is significantly reduced, and that will carry on all the
way through their educational experience,” he said.
Additionally, successful programs in Career Technical Education,
designed to stem the approximate 50 percent high school drop-out
rate, would be cut, Garamendi said.
To better familiarize himself with the impact of state university
system, Garamendi started a series of “listening tours,” which
include visits to community colleges, high schools, vocational
training programs, as well as meetings with business and
labor leaders. On a recent visit to the Center for Advanced
Research and Technology, a partnership of the Clovis and
Fresno unified school districts, the principal explained
how the CTE program used creative relevance to keep students
interested.
For instance, Garamendi said, one student was concerned that
he had received a B in chemistry, but he had not taken chemistry.
The principal pointed out that, in fact, he had, but the
course was called “CSI” after the crime lab television
drama. Similarly, a healthcare course was called “ER,” and
an auto course was called “NASCAR 500.” That
innovative program may be cut, Garamendi said.
It is imperative, Garamendi said, that Californians understand
the devastation the budget cuts can cause. “So we’re
working at that now. We have a program we’re putting
together with the entire education community—for the
first time ever. We are working on making California aware
of the problem of not adequately funding education,” he
said. The coalition—tentatively called the California
Budget Awareness Coalition—will then expand into other
threatened government services.
Work has also started on a comprehensive website that will
include information and an opportunity for grassroots participation
in the effort to find solutions, including a way to create
a “stable funding base for government” so public
service programs are not inextricably tied to either the
tax structure or the volatile economy.
“What we need to do first,” Garamendi said, “is
get people to understand that the total sum of government
services is important,” while also recognizing the
need to “reform, to change and to improve the efficiency
and effectiveness” of the systems. “We’re
going to work together with a common message.”
Mike Feuer, Assemblymember for the 42nd District, is also
concerned about the fiscal crisis and has posted a “California’s
Fiscal Emergency Questionnaire” on his website (www.democrats.assembly.ca.gov/members/a42/)
asking for citizen guidance in setting priorities.
|