|
By Denise Penn
Bisexual activists were well represented among the more
than 2,500 lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender rights
advocates convened in Oakland, Calif., to strategize around
the critical 2006 mid-term elections. Racial justice was
a key critical theme: As LGBT people are facing unprecedented
attacks, the right-wing attempts to divide the African-American
and LGBT communities to keep them from working together
on issues of justice and equality. Combating these divisive
efforts and strategizing for racial justice was a key focus
of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force's Creating Change
Conference, which included a pre-conference People of Color
Organizing Institute and conference-wide workshops on racial
and economic justice.
Bisexual activist and author Loraine Hutchins, co-editor
of Bi Any Other Name: Bisexual People Speak Out, and one
of the founders of the modern bisexual movement, and Juba
Kalamka (aka Pointfivefag), founding member of "homohop" crew
Deep Dickollective (D/DC), were the opening speakers for
the Thursday night plenary session Nov. 10.
Bisexuality and biphobia were important issues addressed
at the conference. The religious right's attempts
to create divisiveness within the LGBT community by promoting
biphobia have been evident. Earlier this year, after an
article titled "Straight, Gay or Lying? Bisexuality
Revisited" appeared on the front page of The New York
Times Science section on July 5, there was a firestorm
of controversy. The article, which delved into reactions
to a study of male sexuality, discounted bisexuality completely
by concluding that bisexual men essentially do not exist.
Task Force Executive Director Matt Foreman took the lead
in organizing a response to the study: "The profoundly
flawed 'study' [is] laced with biased premises, misstatements
and inaccuracies. It equates sexual orientation with sexual
arousal, as supposedly measured by a crude device -- considered
highly suspect by researchers -- in the hands of an
individual with a long history of controversial research.
It defames the truth in the lives and loves of millions
of bisexual men," he stated.
In the opening plenary, Hutchins addressed racism, sexism,
biphobia, and homophobia as well as the themes of sexual
freedom and liberation that were part of the movement in
the '60s and '70s. She shared her favorite
icon: Wonder Woman. "I have an obsession with Wonder
Woman and have since the early '70s," she said. "As
a dominatrix who is neither married nor a mom, she subverts
gender norms, and advocates love, discipline and emotional
re-education through bodily exercise and erotic bondage.
She's all about pleasure and non-reproductive sex; sounds
pretty queer to me."
"It was comforting to have Wonder Woman there as the
war in Iraq looms," said Hutchins. "When I'm
channeling Wonder Woman I quote the original 1940s Wonder
Woman comic strip which explains her mission in this world.
'Remember she came here from an all-women's land to help
out the U.S. government in a time of war. She is here because
the forces of evil threaten our planet and my dear mother,
the Amazon Queen of Paradise Island, has sent me here to
the man's world to teach you all the way of loving submission
to justice, and enlist you in her service to truth and love.'"
The plenary speech delivered by Juba Kalamka, founding
member of "homohop" crew, Deep Dickollective,
known for his commentary on the convergences and conflicts
of race, identity, sexuality and class in pop culture focused
on racism within the community and on racial, social and
economic justice as well as commentary about life as a
bisexual man. He talked about being 19 years old and seeing
the late black gay filmmaker Marlon Riggs' film Tongues
Untied on public television and then going to the Castro
for the first time "I visited the Castro for the
first time and found myself outside near the Castro Theater
where Riggs walks in several scenes. In that moment, I
thought, 'This is why I am here -- I am home.'"
"My idyllic notions of a queer community that was progressive
around race had been shattered years before by Riggs' film,
by the way he described his experience of the pervasive racism
of the Castro and the Bay Area's extended gay community.
Nevertheless, the infighting that existed among queer factions
and how it began to overlap my preexisting issues made for
some challenges around creating community out of these communities."
Kalamka expressed some of the challenges in blunt terms: "As
part of those challenges, I learned that I and my fellow
bisexuals weren't gay enough for a biphobic gay-ristocracy;
that I dated too many women and too many white men for
a black gay community; that I was too nigga, too hip-hop,
and too feminist for a white gay male community comfortable
in its overt and implicit misogyny and racism; too black
and too funky and too black sissy for parts of my bisexual
community too steeped in oblivious privilege and heteronormative
pretense to recognize the overlaps of its classism, sexism,
racism, and transphobia."
"As a black bisexual man, I have been at once frustrated
and exhilarated standing at the intersection of communities
and (seeming) conflicts of identity. To my gay brothers
and lesbian sisters -- my brothers especially because
the policy decisions of gay-identified men have controlled
the timbre of much of the conversation within queer institutions."
Some attendees found the opening session a bit too "in
your face," but Foreman disagreed, emphasizing that
these are challenging times. There were several workshops
on bisexual politics, bisexual health, and "honoring
and getting beyond labels," as well as one on bisexuals
and the same-sex marriage issue. There was also a bisexual
caucus meeting which included a strategy session and plans
for the next conference.
Kalamka's call to action was both a pledge to work together
and a warning: "When they come -- and you know
who I mean by they -- they will come for all of us,
like they always have. When they come, they will not ask
if you are queer in a same or different sex relationship,
if you are monogamous or not, or how long you've been with
a current partner. They will not care if you've sucked
two dicks or 2,247 clits, if it was an hour ago or at Creating
Change '98. They will not care if you are top, bottom,
or switch, or how long you've been clean. They will not
care if you're a Kinsey six and it was just that once that
you snuck and had sex with a girl or a boy. What will matter
is that they know -- because you were here, today -- that
you are not one of them, and that is all that matters."
|