|
By Ramy Eletreby
Ford To Advertise All Brands in Gay Publications
On Dec. 14, Ford Motor Co. reversed its decision to pull
advertising for Jaguar and Land Rover from gay publications
after receiving heat from several gay rights organizations
that accused Ford of bowing to the religious right. The reversal
comes less than two weeks after the Mississippi-based American
Family Association (AFA) threatened to boycott the automotive
company for being too gay-friendly, which is believed to
have prompted Ford's decision to pull their advertisements.
Ford cited cost cutting as the reason.
On Dec. 12, a coalition of 12 LGBT advocacy groups, including
the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD),
the Human Rights Campaign, and the National Gay & Lesbian
Task Force met with Ford executives in Washington, D.C.,
and urged them to ignore anti-gay groups such as the AFA.
In a letter to the coalition on Dec. 14, the automaker
decided to increase their advertising in the gay media and
include all eight Ford b rands, though the ads will not be
gay-specific. In addition to Jaguar, Land Rover, and Volvo
ads, the automaker will now advertise its Ford, Lincoln,
Mercury, Mazda, and Aston Martin brands. On the same day,
the coalition released a joint statement applauding Ford
Motor Co. for its commitment to fairness and equality.
"It's important for corporations and media companies
alike to understand that these anti-gay groups with the deceptive
names do not speak for America's families," said GLAAD
President Neil G. Giuliano. "When 90 percent of Americans
support employment non-discrimination for gays and lesbians,
when 80 percent support military service by gay Americans,
when six out of 10 Americans favor legal protections for
gay and lesbian couples, it's clear that Ford's policies
are in line with the values and the inclusion that most Americans
support."
Gay Political Groups Announce Alito Opposition
On Dec. 12, the National Gay & Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF)
joined forces with six other national LGBT political groups
to announce opposition to Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr.'s nomination
to the U.S. Supreme Court. The other groups are the Human
Rights Campaign; the National Black Justice Coalition (NBJC);
Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund; the National Center
for Lesbian Rights; the National Stonewall Democrats; and
Parents, Families & Friends of Lesbians & Gays.
Alito has served on the U.S. Court of Appeals in the Third
Circuit since 1990 and has only delivered an opinion on two
gay-related issues in that time, out of more than 800 rulings.
Alito ruled in favor of gay interests in one issue but against
gay interests in the other. However, the LGBT groups based
their opposition on a wider study of Alito's rulings, such
as on general civil, abortion, privacy, and free speech rights. "For
African Americans there has been no more important institution
in the nation that the Supreme Court," said NBJC Executive
Director Alexander Robinson. "In his 15 years as a
dissenter on the federal appeals court, Judge Alito has been
hostile to race discrimination cases and sought to narrow
individual rights."
The seven groups accuse Alito of putting his conservative
political agenda ahead of certain inalienable constitutional
rights. "We do not believe that Judge Alito has the
necessary commitment to liberty and equality for all Americans," said
Lambda Legal Executive Director Kevin Cathcart. "Put
differently, his political agenda leads him to write judiciary
decisions to make the law conform to his politics. Then he
applies legal craftsmanship and precedent to justify the
law he is making."
Six Iowa Same-Sex Couples Sue State
On Dec. 13, Lambda Legal filed a lawsuit in Polk County,
Iowa, against the state's Defense of Marriage Act on behalf
of six same-sex couples who seek to marry. The lawsuit maintains
that Iowa state law guarantees equal protection and due process,
which would make barring couples from marrying unlawful.
"This lawsuit is about fairness and equality," said
Lambda Legal attorney Camilla Taylor. "Since marriage
is the way the government provides protection, support and
respect for families, it is only fair that these couples
be able to marry." Tax benefits, property inheritance
rights, workers' compensation death benefits, and the right
to make health-care decisions are all in limbo for couples
that do not have the ability to marry.
The Iowa Family Policy Center (IFPC), a conservative organization,
sees the lawsuit as evading the will of the state's residents. "Rather
than trusting Iowans to decide this critical social issue,
Lambda Legal hopes to force Iowans to accept same-sex marriage
through the courts," said IFPC President Chuck Hurley
in a statement. "The people of Iowa should decide this
issue, not a handful of unelected judges."
Log Cabin Republicans Honor Ariz. Rep. Jim Kolbe
The 2006 Log Cabin Republicans National Dinner, held during
the 2006 Log Cabin National Convention and Liberty Education
Forum National Symposium, will pay tribute to openly gay
Republican Congressman Jim Kolbe from Arizona, who recently
announced his retirement after 11 terms in the House of Representatives. "As
a loyal Republican, Jim Kolbe never wavered in making a conservative
case that all Americans should be treated equally regardless
of sexual orientation," says Log Cabin President Patrick
Guerriero. "From serving the people of Arizona, to
promoting free trade, to fighting global AIDS, to standing
up for equality, Jim Kolbe's public service has made Congress
and our nation better." Congressman Kolbe is one of
the main backers of a current bill to repeal the "Don't
Ask, Don't Tell" policy in the military. The 2006 Log
Cabin Convention will be held April 27-30 in Washington,
D.C.
Soldier to Leave Army after Anti-Gay Attack
Pvt. Kyle Lawson requested a discharge from the 309th Military
Intelligence Battalion at Fort Huachuca, Ariz. after suffering
from two attacks when a friend let it slip at a battalion
party that Lawson was gay. According to Lawson, a fellow
soldier punched him in the face at an off-post party on Oct.
29 and a week later a second soldier threatened him with
a knife outside a barracks. After the knife incident, Lawson
started sleeping on a cot under his drill sergeant's watch.
Lawson's story adds fuel to the already growing fire under
the federal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, which
bans openly gay troops from serving in the U.S. military.
According to the Service Members' Legal Defense Network (SLDN)
in Washington, D.C., over 900 troops were verbally or physically
harassed in 2004 because of their sexual orientation, citing
the policy as inciting negativity towards gays. "When
the military as an institution can discriminate against you,
what message does that send to your co-workers about how
they can treat you?" said SLDN's Steve Ralls.
Nearly 10,000 gays and lesbians have been discharged so
far under federal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." A
bill backed by 100 federal lawmakers from both parties to
repeal the 12-year-old policy is currently under discussion.
Virginia Governor Protects Gays in Hiring
On Dec. 15, with less than a month left in office, Virginia
Gov. Mark D. Warner, a Democrat, amended an executive order
to clearly ban state agencies from discriminating against
gays in hiring and promotions. The policy went into effect
immediately. Incoming Gov.-elect Timothy M. Kaine, also a
Democrat, reportedly plans to maintain the policy by signing
the same executive order when he is inaugurated on Jan. 14.
Lawmakers and activists have pledged to rescind the policy,
which would require a two-thirds vote if Kaine refused to
sign it.
Warner, who is being touted as a possible presidential
candidate in 2008, also added sexual orientation to the nondiscrimination
language in the recently-delivered $72 billion budget. LGBT
rights activists applauded Warner's action. "It's bringing
Virginia in line with the majority of other states that have
these laws on the books," said Dyana Mason, executive
director of Equality Virginia, the state's largest gay rights
group.
Chris Freund, communications director for the conservative
group Family Foundation, says there is no evidence that discrimination
against gays in state hiring exists.
|