|
By Karen Ocamb
Voters have until the election in November to determine
whether Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's State of the State
address Jan. 5 was a bold vision from a newly humbled centrist
public servant or a savvy acting job crafted to get him
re-elected.
Schwarzenegger began his speech like a wounded general,
acknowledging that his Terminator-style rhetoric of calling
Democratic legislators "girlie-men," and
joking about besting "special interest" teaches
and nurses resulted in the defeat of his "reform" initiative
packages in last November's special election and to his
plummet in the polls.
"Now it's true that I was in too much of a hurry.
I didn't hear the majority of Californians when they were
telling me they didn't like the special election. I barreled
ahead anyway when I should have listened," Schwarzenegger
said. "I have absorbed my defeat and I have learned
my lesson. And the people, who always have the last word,
sent a clear message: Cut the warfare, cool the rhetoric,
find common ground and fix the problems together. To my fellow
Californians, I say message received."
The governor outlined a $222-billion, 10-year Strategic
Growth Plan to essentially rebuild the foundations of California,
shoring up ports, levees, waterways, fixing and expanding
freeways, and building schools, prisons, and other public
projects. Though Schwarzenegger's plan reminded many of
former Gov. Edmund "Pat" Brown's dedicated
building of California's infrastructure and education system,
the subtext of Schwarzenegger's speech spoke more to avoiding
another Hurricane Katrina or tsunami disaster, to which,
historian Kevin Starr recently opined in the Los Angeles
Times, the state is vulnerable. ("California's Calamity
in Waiting," Current, Nov. 20, 2005).
Other proposals, some of which seemed to embrace Democratic
positions he previously opposed, such as increasing the
minimum wage and supporting negotiations on importation
of prescriptions drugs, were met with cynical confusion. "It
would be very hard for someone to determine from these
various positions precisely what Schwarzenegger stands
for," Thomas Hollihan, a media and politics professor
at USC's Annenberg School for Communication, told the Times.
Deprived of sharp partisan distinctions, the two Democrats
vying for the job of unseating Schwarzenegger, state Treasurer
Phil Angelides and Controller Steve Westly, attacked the
governor's character and political flip-flopping.
Westly credited Schwarzenegger for "taking some steps
in the right direction." But, he told the Times, "We're
looking for some evidence of core values. I don't know
what he believes."
The plan, Angelides told the Times, had "no credibility" since
the governor initially cut education, made getting into
college harder, and he "absolutely failed to invest
in our infrastructure."
"The governor's State of the State speech demonstrates,
once again, the stream of hypocrisy we see flowing from the
Republican Party. The words do not equal the actions," said
Michael Andraychak, president of Stonewall Democratic Club. "He
vetoed two bills that would have given Californians access
to lower-cost drugs from Canada and other countries. Now,
suddenly, he seems to support this concept. It doesn't take
a MENSA mind to see that the governor is fighting now for
his political life, and he'll say anything, anything at all,
to restore his approval ratings."
While AIDS Healthcare Foundation appreciated Schwarzenegger's
call on Congress to allow for re-importation of prescription
drugs, "it is not enough," AHF President
Michael Weinstein said. "We cannot wait for Congress
to do the right thing. Relief for Californians is long
overdue, so the governor must come to the table today with
California consumers of prescription drugs to find immediate
and realistic solutions to the stubborn prescription drug
crisis."
Openly gay Democrat Daniel Zingale, chief of staff to famed
Democrat and first lady Maria Shriver, had a different
reaction. "It's a very impressive plan," Zingale
told IN. "It addresses the problems Californians
face today and in our future and in a substantive, detailed
and financially responsible way. It is very hard to argue
with the facts, the plan and the blueprint that he put
forward and I think the inspiring thing about it is that
it rises above partisan differences. We all have a shared
interest in improving our schools, reducing our time in
traffic, and those are exactly the kinds of quality of
life issues that the governor has taken aim at."
He also disputes the idea that Schwarzenegger's speech
was a ploy to get re-elected. "I have never seen
Arnold Schwarzenegger as a typical Republican or typical
politician in any way," Zingale said. "I
believe what we saw in the State of the State and today
going forward is the same Arnold Schwarzenegger whom people
elected in the recall election. I think the ideas he's
putting forward and will continue to put forward are reflective
of what the people were looking for when they brought him
into office."
Zingale, who previously worked at AIDS Action Council,
the Human Rights Campaign, and in Gov. Gray Davis' cabinet,
where he created the Department of Managed Care, said he
strongly supported Schwarzenegger's call on Congress to
change federal policy on prescriptions drugs.
"I think it's enormously important and positive that
the governor of California has taken up the battle for more
affordable prescription drugs," Zingale told IN. "I
think he is right on to put the first responsibility where
it belongs, which is with the federal government currently
standing in the way of safe importation of more affordable
drugs. Perhaps it is an uphill battle but that's not an excuse
for not waging it."
Republican Majority Leader Sen. Bill Frist has agreed to
hold a vote this year on importation of drugs, Zingale
said. "A lot of people aren't aware of that. But
that makes it a real issue. This is an election year -- I
think it is difficult for senators to vote against importation
of prescription drugs even under pressure from the pharmaceutical
lobby. So the governor of California weighing in and doing
it in a free-market way could be much more of a factor
than people think."
Zingale said he offers help and advice to Schwarzenegger
and Shriver on health-care issues, and AIDS in particular. "There
is no doubt in my mind that this governor will fund AIDS
to the level that we need it funded for the people who
need care, treatment, and prevention. There is a clear
commitment there on his part," he said.
Zingale is "having a blast" working for Shriver, "perhaps
the most remarkable, funny, intelligent, and dedicated
person I've had the privilege of working with. There's
never a dull moment. Her commitment to public service and
making the world a better place is deeply ingrained in
her. She performs her public service with joy and exuberance
and to work alongside of her is exhilarating," especially
on issues such as "finding current solutions to
problems affecting the working poor. She'll be playing
a major role in a poverty conference on Feb. 2-3 at USC
sponsored by the Sisters of Charity. She's co-chairing
the conference with Sen. Dianne Feinstein and former Sen.
John Edwards is giving the keynote address," Zingale
said. "So that's one of the coolest things."
Disputing published accounts, Zingale said it was Schwarzenegger,
not Shriver, who recruited openly gay Democrat Susan Kennedy
to become the governor's chief of staff. "The governor
chose Susan Kennedy," he said. "He knew her
long before the first lady did through her work on the
PUC (Public Utilities Commission) and was impressed with
her from start."
Zingale, who has been with his partner Chuck Supple (they
have two sons) for 25 years, said he has spoken with Shriver
about gay marriage, though he wouldn't divulge their discussion.
However, when told of pro-gay marriage comments Shriver
made as a correspondent for NBC's Dateline during an interview
with David Mixner, Zingale said he wouldn't contradict
those remarks.
As for Schwarzenegger, Zingale said, "I think it's
of great value that a Republican governor has said that
as a Catholic and as a father he has no personal problem
with gay marriage. That's in truth a milestone for the
office of governor in the state of California. I'm paraphrasing,
but if you look at his statement in the media around the
veto [of the marriage bill], you'll find something pretty
close to that. I was struck by it because that was a new
high-water for mark for anybody occupying this office in
this state."
Politicos say the marriage equality bill will probably
not be re-introduced this year.
|