|
By Albert Gore Jr.
(Editor's note: On Jan. 16, former Vice President
Al Gore delivered a Martin Luther King Jr. Day speech at
DAR Constitution Hall sponsored by a coalition of liberal
and conservative groups, including MoveOn.org and the Free
Congress Foundation, concerned with issues of privacy and
civil liberties. Gore called for a special counsel to investigate
the warrentless domestic spying program on individuals
and groups, including gay groups, authorized by President
George W. Bush. Attorney Gen. Alberto Gonzales has said
that Bush has the legal authority to order surveillance
without a court order under his power as commander in chief
and as a result of a congressional resolution in response
to the Sept. 11 attacks. Former Georgia Republican Congressmember
Bob Barr was slated to introduce Gore. Below are excerpts
from Gore's 7,658-word speech, the full text of
which can be read at rawstory.com/news/2005/Text_of_Gore_speech_0116.html or watched at www.c-span.org. --Karen
Ocamb)

Congressman
Barr and I have disagreed many times over the years,
but we have joined together today with thousands of our
fellow citizens -- Democrats and Republicans alike -- to
express our shared concern that America's Constitution
is in grave danger ...
As we begin this new year, the executive branch of our
government has been caught eavesdropping on huge numbers
of American citizens and has brazenly declared that it
has the unilateral right to continue without regard to
the established law enacted by Congress precisely to prevent
such abuses. It is imperative that respect for the rule
of law be restored in our country.
And that is why many of us have come here to Constitution
Hall to sound an alarm and call upon our fellow citizens
to put aside partisan differences insofar as it is possible
to do so and join with us in demanding that our Constitution
be defended and preserved.
[One] month ago, Americans awoke to the shocking news that
... the executive branch has been secretly spying on large
numbers of Americans for the last four years and eavesdropping
on, and I quote the report, "large volumes of telephone
calls, e-mail messages, and other Internet traffic inside
the United States." The New York Times reported that
the president decided to launch this massive eavesdropping
program "without search warrants or any new laws that
would permit domestic intelligence collection."
During the period when this eavesdropping was still secret,
the president seemed to go out of his way to reassure the
American people on more than one occasion that, of course,
judicial permission is required for any government spying
on American citizens and that, of course, these constitutional
safeguards were still in place.
But surprisingly, the president's soothing statements turned
out to be false. Moreover, as soon as this massive domestic
spying program was uncovered by the press, the president
not only confirmed that the story was true, but in the
next breath declared that he has no intention of stopping
or of bringing these wholesale invasions of privacy to
an end.
At present, we still have much to learn about the [National
Security Agency's] domestic surveillance. What we
do know about this pervasive wiretapping virtually compels
the conclusion that the president of the United States
has been breaking the law repeatedly and insistently.
A president who breaks the law is a threat to the very
structure of our government. Our Founding Fathers were
adamant that they had established a government of laws
and not men. They recognized that the structure of government
they had enshrined in our Constitution -- our system
of checks and balances -- was designed with a central
purpose of ensuring that it would govern through the rule
of law ...
An executive who arrogates to himself the power to ignore
the legitimate legislative directives of the Congress or
to act free of the check of the judiciary becomes the central
threat that the Founders sought to nullify in the Constitution
-- an all-powerful executive too reminiscent of the king
from whom they had broken free. In the words of James
Madison, "The
accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and
judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or
many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective,
may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny." ...
If the president has the inherent authority to eavesdrop
on American citizens without a warrant, imprison American
citizens on his own declaration, kidnap and torture, then
what can't he do? ...
As a result of this unprecedented claim of new unilateral
power, the executive branch has now put our constitutional
design at grave risk. The stakes for America's democracy
are far higher than has been generally recognized ...
I call upon Democratic and Republican members of Congress
today to uphold your oath of office and defend the Constitution.
Stop going along to get along. Start acting like the independent
and co-equal branch of American government you are supposed
to be under the Constitution of our country ...
We the people are -- collectively -- still the
key to the survival of America's democracy. We must examine
ourselves. We -- as Lincoln put it, "[e]ven we
here" -- must examine our own role as citizens
in allowing and not preventing the shocking decay and hollowing
out and degradation of American democracy! It is time to
stand up for the American system that we know and love!
It is time to breathe new life back into America's
democracy! ...
We have a duty as Americans to defend our citizens' right
not only to life but also to liberty and the pursuit of
happiness. It is therefore vital in our current circumstances
that immediate steps be taken to safeguard our Constitution
against the present danger posed by the intrusive overreaching
on the part of the executive branch and the president's
apparent belief that he need not live under the rule of
law.
I endorse the words of Bob Barr, when he said, and I quote: "The
president has dared the American people to do something
about it. For the sake of the Constitution, I hope they
will."
A special counsel should immediately be appointed by the
attorney general to remedy the obvious conflict of interest
that prevents him from investigating what many believe
are serious violations of law by the president. ...
In closing, I mentioned that along with cause for concern,
there is reason for hope. As I stand here today, I am filled
with optimism that America is on the eve of a golden age
in which the vitality of our democracy will be re-established
by the people and will flourish more vibrantly than ever.
Indeed I can feel it in this hall.
As Dr. King once said, "Perhaps a new spirit is rising
among us. If it is, let us trace its movements and pray
that our own inner being may be sensitive to its guidance,
for we are deeply in need of a new way beyond the darkness
that seems so close around us."
|