|
In the April 10 New York Times, a senior Bush administration
official "confirmed" that the president ordered
the declassification of prewar intel "to rebut critics" but "left
open several questions, including when Mr. Bush acted and
whether he did so on the advice of Mr. Cheney. Still unclear
is the nature of the communication between Mr. Bush and Mr.
Cheney."
Please. The "nature of the communication" may
not be confirmed but is it really unclear?
In his filing last week, Patrick Fitzgerald stated: "The
evidence will show that the July 6, 2003 Op-Ed by Mr. Wilson
was viewed in the Office of the Vice President as a direct
attack on the credibility of the vice president (and the
president)..." Note who gets relegated to parentheses-land.
Given this, choose the more plausible scenario:
That Cheney goes to (the president) and says: "Look,
we gotta kneecap Wilson before this manipulated intelligence
crap gets out of hand. I wanna have Scooter meet with Miller
and slip her some cherry-picked and puffed-up classified
info from the NIE. I know I've got the constitutional chops
to declassify the stuff myself but why don't you sign off
too, just to be on the safe side."
Or that (the president), a man who wouldn't testify in
front of the 9/11 Commission without Cheney by his side,
suddenly woke up one morning and thought to himself: "I
can't allow these irresponsible, unfounded, wild, and flat-out
false accusations to go unanswered. I need to selectively
declassify the paragraphs at the bottom of page 24 of the
2002 NIE so we can perpetuate the myth that Iraq was 'vigorously
trying to procure' uranium from Africa. Then I'll tell Cheney
to tell Libby to tell Judy that this was a 'key judgment'
of the assessment, even though the 'key judgments' actually
don't mention uranium at all. Later, I'll launch an all-out
attack on leaks and leaking -- just to throw them off the
scent. And, if years later this mess ever comes out, I can
always have my press secretary say -- 10 times -- that my
decision was 'in the public interest.' Let me get Cheney
on the phone and give him his marching orders."
Picture an updated version of that classic SNL sketch where
Phil Hartman portrayed Ronald Reagan as a doddering doofus
in public who, behind the scenes, turns into a take-charge,
on-top-of-every-detail commander-in-chief.
Here it's Bush as über-president--his hand firmly
on the wheel.
As implausible as that scenario sounds, the thought of
Bush as our decisive leaker-in-chief makes me feel a whole
lot better than the reality of Cheney once again calling
the shots.
|