|
By Joseph S. Amster
Op/Ed Counterpoint
In counterpoint to Karen Ocamb’s Op/Ed in issue 9.10,
L.A. Gays Not Statistically Significant, I believe there
are other reasons why there was little coverage of Christopher
Street West in the Los Angeles Times. As a reporter and editor,
I believe that after 36 years of gay pride parades in Los
Angeles, the event is simply no longer newsworthy outside
of the gay press. Given that, the Times, did run two large
pictures of the event on page 2 of their California section,
which took up nearly a quarter page. Other ethnic parades
and festivals (Chinese and Thai New Year's, Martin Luther
King Day, Little Tokyo's Nisei Week, and the downtown Latino
Festival on Broadway) don't warrant much coverage either,
so it begs the question, why do we? Those other minorities
have been historically, at least, as oppressed as we are
(some would argue more due to slavery, immigration rights,
and internment during World War II), so are these demands
for press coverage the “special rights” the right
wing often accuses us of asking for? The Times does, however,
routinely cover LGBT and HIV/AIDS-related stories. Recent
examples include the debate within the Episcopal Church regarding
the ordination of gay and lesbian clergy, as well as a front-page
story on June 27 about a study that may have proven yet another
genetic component for sexual orientation. Much of the print
media (although not the Times) have also done excellent reporting
about the 25th anniversary of AIDS.
There was a time when history was made at the parade, but
those days are long gone, as well as the activism that made
those times historic. Direct activism is dead—we now
occupy the corridors of power and fight for our rights through
the legislative process instead of taking to the streets.
Although Police Chief Bratton and Sheriff Baca marching in
the parade with other peace officers was significant, the
LAPD and L.A. County Sheriff’s Department have had
contingents in the parade for years. Also, the press was
probably unaware of Bratton and Baca's plans to march in
the parade, as it appears no press releases were issued by
the Sheriff's Department, the LAPD, or Christopher Street
West. There's also the changed message of the parade. As
much as those of us who remember what the parade stood for
would like that message remembered, few who now participate
and watch the parade know that it commemorates a riot and
the birth of our civil rights movement—to them, it's
a big party. Those of us who grew up remembering what Stonewall
meant can scream as much as we want about the younger generation's
lack of knowledge of their history, but it's not going to
change the situation—it's time we accept that reality.
To the point of KCET no longer celebrating Gay Pride Month
with a block of programming, perhaps part of the blame is
due to the current political climate, but I believe it's
also because of a different media landscape. Today, we have
two networks, here! and Logo, dedicated exclusively to LGBT
programming. In addition, other channels like Bravo feature
shows of gay interest. Gay issues are routinely debated on
the numerous 24-hour cable news channels, and the Internet
is a vast resource of LGBT history and information.
I am pleased to hear that the L.A. Times is considering
using the gay and lesbian community as a demographic in November's
election, and we must be vigilant that they do. I am also
disappointed that this hasn't been done in the past. However,
I do not believe the local news media is ignoring our community.
Often, we are not doing a good job of getting our message
across to the media and coming up with innovative ways to
package stories. When there is a story that warrants coverage,
like a court ruling, an important piece of legislation being
vetoed or signed into law, or a study being released, I expect
and see coverage in the Times and other media outlets. That's
the nature of news: Given the limited amount of space in
a newspaper or time in a broadcast, only the most important
stories rise to the top.
Joseph S. Amster is regional editor of IN Los Angeles
magazine.
|